RSS
 

An Analogy for the Daenerys Arc

24 May

Chris was no longer the trembling, passive, and helpless boy that he had once been. Rather than being Daniel’s lackey, or at the mercy of a myriad of other tormentors, he had now only to show deference to the Great Leader. Do you approve of the course that Chris has taken? Do you find his journey uplifting, or empowering? If the answer is, ‘no’, then I would urge you to examine the journey that Daenerys has taken in ‘The Game of Thrones’, and whether you are being morally is consistent, despite the way that these journeys differ in their framing.

Read the full post.

 
 

The Arbiters of Mediocrity

21 May

Let me start out with a bold assertion: game reviewers are, by and
large, contributing towards a tendency in the gaming industry towards
bland, unaspiring, dumbed-down, and downright boring games.

More: http://is.gd/ixE9vY

 
 

The Escapist

18 Mar

‘From the time that the basics of how this world operates entered my
understanding, I knew that it wasn’t for me. Too few were the avenues of
exploration, too mundane were the available/prescribed goals at which to orient
oneself towards, and too avaricious, petty, and utilitarian was the collective
mentality. Indeed, the more I learned about the world, the less I looked
towards the future with any sort of anticipation.’

Read the rest: http://is.gd/gJbBdt

 
 

The Grandeur of Dillo

15 Mar

‘After running through the gamut of major (Firefox, Opera, Seamonkey
Chrome), and not-so-major (Kazehakese (sp), Links2, Uzbl,
Links-hacked, Konqueror, Epiphany, etc.), I have — I hope — finally
settled on Dillo: http://www.dillo.org/’

Read the rest: http://is.gd/apmNrd

 
 

Why I Hate Men

01 Mar

I am (at least biologically) male, and I hate men. Not all of them are disgusting pigs who denigrate women whenever they’re in the presence of their ‘bros’ (but many of them are); so this is not the primary reason for my dislike. Nor is it a product of all the name-calling (‘fag’, ‘sissy’, ‘pussy’, etc.), verbal and physical tormenting carried out by those who felt the need to assert their superior masculinity against my deviant/gender atypical appearance and behavior.

Rather, it is because there is nothing of any worth that men do which women are not capable of *at least* equaling; and they look a whole lot better while doing it (unlike men, women do not suffer from a body warped by androgens into the utilitarian hunter-killer aesthetic). Women are also more vital, embodied, and in-touch with their emotions — at least generally speaking. How much this is a product of millenia of discrepancy in the way that female and male children are socializeed, and how much of it is innate, I am not the least bit sure, but right now, this is the state of things.

If (straight/bi) women only chose from among the best of their inferiors, then I perhaps heterosexual coupling would not be quite the anathema it is to me now — but they don’t! Even the most intelligent, compassionate, and beautiful of women are drawn by some wretched admixture of biological and social imperatives to shackle themselves to the most overgrown, hideous, and douchiest of the male tribe. Indeed, the qualities that women often look up to in men, are not only the worst that men have to offer, but those which are in fact inimical to this fragile state known as ‘civilization’, e.g: aggressiveness/competitiveness, authoritarianism, arrogance (often conflated with ‘confidence’), dominance, etc.

in addition to all the above, there’s nothing as pretty or moving to me as sapphic affection and coupling; and even though this is something that I am personally prevented from ever experiencing, just seeing two women in love is very uplifting. Seeing a woman with a man, on the other hand, seems — at best — a waste.

=====================
Gopher version: gopher://sdf.org:70/0/users/mrgnash/phlog/01-03-2011.txt

 
 

‘Sapphic Sirens’ Update

16 Feb











Here, or here: gopher://sdf.org:70/1/users/mrgnash/lists

 
 

Sapphic Sirens: The Resurrection

01 Jan

I know it’s been a long time since I last published an update for my Sapphic Sirens list. One reason for the delay is that I actually lost a lot of the the work I’d done on the list inbetween this update and the last due to a botched system upgrade. The other is that I decided to go ahead and write the whole thing up using ConTeXt instead of LaTeX (I figured I could get it to look better, that way). So, in actual fact, this is really more of a ‘reboot’ than an update, and as such, the siren count is much lower than what it was up to last time. I am rapidly adding and re-adding models though, so I’ll keep you posted with future updates.

Here: gopher://sdf.org/d/users/mrgnash/lists/Sapphic_Sirens.pdf
… or, here.

 
 

Genre TV Round-Up

25 Nov

###################
#Genre TV Round-Up#
###################

1. THE WALKING DEAD
*******************************

Everyone seems to love this show, and sure, the production values are
far above what we have become accustomed to from most genre tv shows,
and there the writers have made a considerable effort to give the
characters from some depth… but I’m really not loving it.

For one thing, none of the characters appeal to me at all. They’re all
so very bland and insipid. I mean, I never really warm to male
characters at the best of times, so my lack of regard for any of the
ones featured in this show is to be expected, but none of the women are
the least bit interesting, either. For the most part, the women just
sit around the camp, tending to cooking, cleaning, etc. and talking
about the “men folk.” I actually think that the show is trying to make
a point about progress made in gender equality having being reversed
because of apocalyptic events — namely the zombie outbreak. That’s
kinda clever, but without even one women to buck the trend, and take up
arms as a true badass (where is Michelle Rodriguez when you need her? )
there’s just nobody for me to take a liking to.

As such, I just resent it when the show spends any time trying to
develop these characters, or asking me to care for them. So far, the
highlight of the show for me was when their camp was unexpectedly
raided by a pack of zombies, and a number of characters were eaten as a
result. I only wish that the zombies had killed the lot of them, so
that the show could start fresh with better characters.

2. STARGATE UNIVERSE
********************************

If it weren’t for the fact that I am so hard-up for a sci-fi set
onboard a ship (oh how I miss ye Star Trek… yes, even you, Voyager),
there is not a chance in hell that I would watch this show. It’s like a
cheap immitation of Battlestar Galactica, which was itself, a rather
wrteched production; especially towards the end. Like Battlestar
Galactica, it also shows signs of going in a religious direction;
meaning that I should probably jettison my escape pod sooner, rather
than later.

3. SUPERNATURAL
********************************

After last season’s anti-climactic showdown between a peculiarly
powerless prince of darkness and his angelic nemesis, I did not think
that I would return to this show. As is so often the case, however, the
lack of good genre tv ultimately weakened my resolve, and I ended up
reluctantly sitting down to watch the first episode. If I thought I
could stop there, I was a fool, because this show is definitely expert
at hooking its viewers. It raises just enough tantalizing questions,
and promises just enough kick-ass encounters to keep you hanging out
until the next episode.

Despite never having cared about either of the main characters, or the
trials of their brotherly bonds, the show has always had enough of the
supernatural goods to make it worthwhile for an escapism-prone geek
like me. Unfortunately, anticipated pay-offs promised by various plot
arcs often don’t pan out, and there are always a good proportion of
filler episodes interspersed throughout each seasons run. I just hope
that this season, the writers will not take the lazy, or budget-saving,
way out.

4. THE VAMPIRE DIARIES
*********************************

After the surprising awesomeness of the show’s first season, I had high
hope for season number two. So far, those high hopes have mostly gone
unfulfilled. In fact, I think that it’s only the attractive cast,
consisting of babes like Nina Dobrev, Candice Accola, and Katerina
Graham, that kept me going through some of thin gruel fed to the
audience thus far. Luckily, the show is just starting to get cool
again, with the introduction of some ancient vampires (and we all know
from The World of Darkness that the older the vampire, the more
powerful they are), and the promise of expanding the mythos beyond the
pitiful relationship dramas of the main characters.

5. LOST GIRL
*********************************

I came perilously close to rage-quitting this series after the 2nd ep,
where the show ends by having the main character — a succubus by the
name of ‘Bo’ — shack up with some over-muscled vampire douche. My
disappointment was all the more potent because I had such lofty
expectations of the show going in: how could a show about a bisexual
succubus _not_ be awesome? Well, by including the ‘guy’ part of being
bi, I guess.

Ultimately though, the allure of having a premise where race of diverse
and super-powered humanoids known as ‘Fae’ who are split in two
factions are are on the knife-edge of a war that would wipe out all of
mankind if it ever took place, proved too much for me, and I went
back. So far, I’m glad that I did, because the writing, casting,
plotting… everything is so well done. Plus, the Bo’s b/g roll in the
hay was mercifully brief, and non-explicit — unlike, for instance,
what I have endured while watching True Blood. Better yet, there was no
Buffy-esque lingering attachment on Bo’s part… she slept with the
guy, mainly to heal herself (yes, she feeds on carnal energies, or
something), and then that was it — well, mostly, anyway. Oh yeah, and
righ after that, she felt up a sexy (female) dean after infiltrating a
college, and encouraged her sidekick, Kenzi, to engage in some “pillow
fighting” with the sorority sisters she was investigating. Yum.

Speaking of Kenzi, she is pretty awesome, even though she declared an
exclusively androphilic orientation at the end of the first episode.
I’m willing to bet that Bo can break her down. Also, she’s played by
the exotically gorgeous Ksenia Solo, who gives me butterflies in my
stomach whenever she’s on screen. If my prediction is right, the
pairing between her and Anna Silk (Bo), will be very hot indeed.

6. FRINGE
*********************************

The scientist in me has to be buried deep under earth while watching
this show, or his screaming protestations at the absurdities contained
therein are far too distracting. With that done, however, it’s a very
enjoyable show. It may even be better than the somewhat-similar
X-Files; if only because the plot actually moves forward from
episode-to-episode, rather than constantly baiting the audience with
the promise that *this* will be the episode where the coverup will
finally be blown.

7. RIESE
*********************************

Not bad for a web series, and its definitely helped by the
Fallout-esque vibe and cute heroine, but the ~9min episode format does
not sit well with me.

SHOWS I’M NOT WATCHING
*********************************

CAPRICA: More like Craprica, amirite? Even if it was good, I wouldn’t
watch it. I have no interest in further elaboration of the BSG
universe, after the final answer to every question raised by the first
series turned out to be, ‘god did it.’

THE EVENT: Sorry show, you’ll need to set your sights a little higher than Lost to get my attention.

SHOWS I WISH I WERE STILL ON
*********************************

LEGEND OF THE SEEKER: Best swords-and-sorcery fantasy series, ever.
Period. Plus, Tabrett Bethel.

ENTERPRISE: You had your flaws, but you were so much better than SGU or
BSG. I also want Linda Park’s Hoshi back.

FIREFLY: Goes without saying, right?

BUFFY: But only if she turned to the dark side (e.g: the good side, e.g: lesbianism).

Plain text available here, or here: gopher://sdf.org:70/0/users/mrgnash/phlog/25-11-2010.txt

 
 

Porn Stars

16 Nov

Why do people look down on models/performers in the adult entertainment industry? Why do some cretins denigrate them as being “sluts”, “whores”, etc.? It makes very little sense to me. Now it is true that I take a rather dim view of sleeping with men — to me, it is aesthetically repulsive and intrinsically degrading to the woman involved — and so I must admit that my fondness for a given performer decreases relative to her involvement with the b/g genre — conversely, my fondness is positivelyr related to their involvement in the girl-on-girl genre, and how genuine their affection for/attraction to other women seems to be. But, I do not see any difference between what adult performers appear in b/g scenes do, and what most heterosexual women do. The only difference between them is that adult performers receive some amount of monetary compensation — which, if anything, I regard as being a more legitimate reason to sleep with men than doing so out of genuine attraction — and, that a proportion of the sex they engage in is recorded and made available to consumers.

Keep reading here, or here: gopher://sdf.org:70/0/users/mrgnash/phlog/16-11-2010.txt

 
 

Yes, Another ‘Sapphic Sirens’ Update

14 Nov







Here, or here: gopher://sdf.org:70/d/users/mrgnash/lists/Sapphic_Sirens.pdf